Community Rights Counsel
The Community Rights Counsel was an American non-profit, public interest law firm formed in 1997 by the late Doug Kendall. Its general aim was to assist communities in protecting their health and welfare. The organization's legal work focused on the intersection of environmental and constitutional law, filing frequent amicus briefs in cases defending governmental action against claims of "regulatory takings."
Activities
The group promoted judicial ethics, exposing the practice of judges attending junkets sponsored by right wing think tanks that espoused free market anti-regulatory philosophies.[1] Their findings were published in two reports, Nothing for Free: How Private Judicial Seminars Are Undermining Environmental Protections and Breaking the Public's Trust (July 2000), and Tainted Justice: How Private Judicial Trips Undermine Public Trust in the Federal Judiciary (March 2004).[2] A version of Tainted Justice was published in the Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 18:65-134.
The group has since been absorbed into the Constitutional Accountability Center,[2] a legal advocacy group.[3]
Cases
The group filed many amicus briefs in state and federal appellate courts and the Supreme Court supporting the federal government. Among their notable briefs was an amicus submission in Gonzales v. Raich (2005).[4] The case concerned whether the federal government had the power to regulate medical marijuana under the Constitution's Commerce Clause, which is the basis of federal authority for many health, safety, welfare, and environmental statutes. Had the federal government lost, many federal laws and regulations might not be enforceable except by a state-level action.
References
- ^ Bruss, Keith (2014-10-22). "Wrongful death lawsuits: who can file one?". Retrieved 2024-06-15.
- ^ a b "About CRC". Archived from the original on 2009-04-29. Retrieved 2009-06-10.
- ^ Liptak, Adam (28 June 2013). "Roberts Pulls Supreme Court to the Right Step by Step". The New York Times.
- ^ Lane, Charles (2004-11-29). "Court to Hear Marijuana Case Legality of Cultivating Plant for Medical Use Is at Issue". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2009-03-30. Retrieved 2009-06-10.
External links
- Official Website
- v
- t
- e
wound-up
- Alexander & Catalano
- Altheimer & Gray
- Arter & Hadden
- Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison
- Burleson LLP
- Cellino & Barnes
- Coudert Brothers
- Dewey & LeBoeuf
- Dickstein Shapiro
- Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine
- Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey
- Halleck, Peachy & Billings
- Heller Ehrman
- Hill and Barlow
- Howe and Hummel
- Howrey
- Isham Lincoln & Beale
- Jenkens & Gilchrist
- Keck, Mahin & Cate
- Lord Day & Lord
- Lyon & Lyon
- Mudge Rose Guthrie Alexander & Ferdon
- Myerson & Kuhn
- Pennie & Edmonds
- Rider Bennett
- Shea & Gould
- Steven J. Baum P.C.
- Stroock & Stroock & Lavan
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault
- Thacher Proffitt & Wood
- Thelen LLP
- Tillinghast Licht
- Trevor Law Group
- Waesche, Sheinbaum & O'Regan
- Washington, Perito & Dubuc
- Webster & Sheffield
- WolfBlock
or absorbed
to other firms
- Baker & Daniels
- Bingham McCutchen
- Brown & Wood
- Community Rights Council
- Dewey Ballantine
- Dow Lohnes
- Faegre & Benson
- Graham & James
- Hall Dickler Kent Goldstein & Wood
- Hopkins & Sutter
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae
- Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps
- Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl
- Preston Gates & Ellis
- Robinson, Silverman, Pearce, Aronsohn, and Berman
- Rogers & Wells
- Rosenman & Colin
- Shea & Gardner
- Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal
- Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld
- Swidler Berlin Shereff Friedman
- Walter, Conston, Alexander & Green
- Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts
![]() | This United States law firm article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e